“Even with the fairly wide range habitats worldwide that rivers flow through, globally they all face the same relatively small range of problems. While rivers represent a small percentage of our water supply worldwide (most humans are reliant on groundwater), ailing rivers mean altered migration routes, fewer defenses against flooding and erosion, and other issues that directly impact humans.
“If you analyse water-security issues from both a human and biodiversity perspective, you find that the threats are shared and pandemic. Even rich countries, which you would expect to be good stewards of water, have some of the most stressed and threatened areas,” Charles Vörösmarty, a civil engineer at the City University of New York and one of the lead investigators of the analysis, told Nature.
Healing Sick Rivers Means Intelligent Strategy, Not Expensive Projects
The researchers state that their study demonstrates how identifying and then limiting threats at a local level can be more effective at ensuring future water security and biodiversity than intelligent than large-scale, expensive programs. While rich countries can afford to throw money into alleviating symptoms of sick rivers, the study shows that localized efforts at treating the problems — such as smarter dam infrastructure, and water management that incorporates both the needs of humans and local wildlife — is a far better solution for all countries, especially developing countries that lack financial resources.”
Read more: Treehugger











Recent Comments